-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add authentification component #5
Comments
The second part is solved with #27 |
Regarding the first part, do we have any example servers with different authentication methods to test with? |
Not yet unfortunately |
@herzogrh Can this issue be closed? Maybe we can reopen this or open a new ticket once new model servers with different authentication methods pop up. |
Note #47 regarding anonymous process access. |
It should be better specified what exactly may happen for anonymous users, e.g. if they run processes, will job results be stored indefinitely? Will layers be created in Geoserver and be stored indefinitely? @herzogrh |
I guess it would be good to add a configurable number of hours until results of unauthorized users are deleted. The deletion should include both the saved results in the database and the layers in the GeoServer component. What do you think, @herzogrh ? |
Yes I think that's a good solution. I suppose only models which do not require a lot of computational power would be available to unauthorized users, so they would typically receive the results quite fast. Given that, it would be the easiest way if they'd have to wait for their current job, but not see any other jobs that were run by unauthorized users. |
How do we decide which models do not require a lot of computational power, should this not be configurable? |
Yes, this should be configured |
There should be an authentification component that handles
There should be a separate identity and access management system (Keycloak) that is connected with the platform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: