You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I am a researcher currently using this code for battery research.
First of all, I sincerely thank you for developing and sharing such a great solution for DRT.
I have a question regarding the part in the class EIS_object where it says, "we assume that the collocation points equal to 1/freq as default."
Does this mean that when the DRT's ττ is converted to 1/τ, it directly corresponds to the frequency in the EIS data?
If so, when the DRT results are plotted with the x-axis transformed to 1/τ, can they be directly matched with the frequency of the EIS data?
I’m having difficulty fully understanding this part and would greatly appreciate your help. Am I interpreting this assumption correctly, and could you provide any insights into the rationale behind this assumption?
Once again, thank you for your great solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, I am a researcher currently using this code for battery research.
First of all, I sincerely thank you for developing and sharing such a great solution for DRT.
I have a question regarding the part in the class EIS_object where it says, "we assume that the collocation points equal to 1/freq as default."
Does this mean that when the DRT's ττ is converted to 1/τ, it directly corresponds to the frequency in the EIS data?
If so, when the DRT results are plotted with the x-axis transformed to 1/τ, can they be directly matched with the frequency of the EIS data?
I’m having difficulty fully understanding this part and would greatly appreciate your help. Am I interpreting this assumption correctly, and could you provide any insights into the rationale behind this assumption?
Once again, thank you for your great solution.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: