You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Primarily, I think it's a good idea; as I'm definitely one to appreciate the ease of use of a header only library too. On the other hand, while this is definitely a specific add-on, the amount of features that it has (and may continue to add in the future,) definitely benefit from the maintainability of separating the code out. If there's an easy (read: scriptable) way to produce a single header from the existing code, that'd be something I would be willing to investigate.
If you were looking for a single header flavor for your own projects and didn't need the more elaborate customization the current HEAD offers, you might want to fork from d88bae1, which only had a single header and single C++ file, so it'd be far easier to produce a header only version of manually.
Seems to me that for such a specific feature it could be useful to have a single header version to make project inclusion as simple as possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: