-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Incubation] k8gb Incubation Application #1472
Labels
Comments
45 tasks
@rochaporto to triage |
Thanks @elohmrow . In preparation for k8gb to be picked up by a TOC member please:
Also i would recommend working on the following items (it will help speedup the process later):
|
Hi @rochaporto 👋 Thanks for helping with this 👍 WIP
|
elohmrow
added a commit
to elohmrow/k8gb
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2025
Add affiliation information to the list of maintainers. See cncf/toc#1472 (comment) for context. Signed-off-by: Bradley Andersen <[email protected]>
elohmrow
added a commit
to elohmrow/k8gb
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2025
Clarify the security self-assessment. See cncf/toc#1472 (comment) for context. Signed-off-by: Bradley Andersen <[email protected]>
This was referenced Jan 22, 2025
ytsarev
pushed a commit
to k8gb-io/k8gb
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2025
* Update self-assessment.md Clarify the security self-assessment. See cncf/toc#1472 (comment) for context. Signed-off-by: Bradley Andersen <[email protected]> * Update self-assessment.md add @jkremser here as he originally contributed the self assessment Signed-off-by: Bradley Andersen <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Bradley Andersen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
k8gb Incubation Application
v1.5
This template provides the project with a framework to inform the TOC of their conformance to the Incubation Level Criteria.
Project Repo(s): https://github.com/k8gb-io/k8gb
Project Site: https://github.com/k8gb-io/k8gb
Sub-Projects: None
Communication: https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C021P656HGB
Project points of contact:
Yury Tsarev (@ytsarev) [email protected]
@donovanmuller
@k0da
@kuritka
@jkremser
@abaguas
Bradley Andersen (@elohmrow) [email protected]
(Post Incubation only) Book a meeting with CNCF staff to understand project benefits and event resources.
Incubation Criteria Summary for k8gb
Adoption Assertion
The project has been adopted by the following organizations in a testing and integration or production capacity:
Application Process Principles
Suggested
N/A
Required
Give a presentation and engage with the domain specific TAG(s) to increase awareness
TAG provides insight/recommendation of the project in the context of the landscape
All project metadata and resources are vendor-neutral.
Review and acknowledgement of expectations for Sandbox projects and requirements for moving forward through the CNCF Maturity levels.
Due Diligence Review.
Completion of this due diligence document, resolution of concerns raised, and presented for public comment satisfies the Due Diligence Review criteria.
Additional documentation as appropriate for project type, e.g.: installation documentation, end user documentation, reference implementation and/or code samples.
Governance and Maintainers
Note: this section may be augmented by the completion of a Governance Review from TAG Contributor Strategy.
Suggested
Clear and discoverable project governance documentation.
Governance has continuously been iterated upon by the project as a result of their experience applying it, with the governance history demonstrating evolution of maturity alongside the project's maturity evolution.
Governance clearly documents vendor-neutrality of project direction.
Document how the project makes decisions on leadership, contribution acceptance, requests to the CNCF, and changes to governance or project goals.
Document how role, function-based members, or sub-teams are assigned, onboarded, and removed for specific teams (example: Security Response Committee).
Document a complete maintainer lifecycle process (including roles, onboarding, offboarding, and emeritus status).
Demonstrate usage of the maintainer lifecycle with outcomes, either through the addition or replacement of maintainers as project events have required.
If the project has subprojects: subproject leadership, contribution, maturity status documented, including add/remove process.
Required
Document complete list of current maintainers, including names, contact information, domain of responsibility, and affiliation.
A number of active maintainers which is appropriate to the size and scope of the project.
Code and Doc ownership in Github and elsewhere matches documented governance roles.
Document agreement that project will adopt CNCF Code of Conduct.
CNCF Code of Conduct is cross-linked from other governance documents.
All subprojects, if any, are listed.
Contributors and Community
Note: this section may be augmented by the completion of a Governance Review from TAG Contributor Strategy.
Suggested
Required
Clearly defined and discoverable process to submit issues or changes.
Project must have, and document, at least one public communications channel for users and/or contributors.
List and document all project communication channels, including subprojects (mail list/slack/etc.). List any non-public communications channels and what their special purpose is.
Up-to-date public meeting schedulers and/or integration with CNCF calendar.
Documentation of how to contribute, with increasing detail as the project matures.
Demonstrate contributor activity and recruitment.
Engineering Principles
Suggested
Roadmap change process is documented.
History of regular, quality releases.
Required
Document project goals and objectives that illustrate the project’s differentiation in the Cloud Native landscape as well as outlines how this project fulfills an outstanding need and/or solves a problem differently.
Document what the project does, and why it does it - including viable cloud native use cases.
Document and maintain a public roadmap or other forward looking planning document or tracking mechanism.
Document overview of project architecture and software design that demonstrates viable cloud native use cases, as part of the project's documentation.
Document the project's release process.
Security
Note: this section may be augmented by a joint-assessment performed by TAG Security.
Suggested
N/A
Required
Clearly defined and discoverable process to report security issues.
Enforcing Access Control Rules to secure the code base against attacks (Example: two factor authentication enforcement, and/or use of ACL tools.)
Document assignment of security response roles and how reports are handled.
Document Security Self-Assessment.
Achieve the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF) Best Practices passing badge.
Ecosystem
Suggested
N/A
Required
Publicly documented list of adopters, which may indicate their adoption level (dev/trialing, prod, etc.)
Used in appropriate capacity by at least 3 independent + indirect/direct adopters, (these are not required to be in the publicly documented list of adopters)
The project provided the TOC with a list of adopters for verification of use of the project at the level expected, i.e. production use for graduation, dev/test for incubation.
Refer to the Adoption portion of this document.
Additional Information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: