You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PS. colour also doesn't seem to have a thing for "D illuminant of arbitrary CCT"? There are basis functions, but I don't see anything mixing them together.
Thanks, I vaguely remember seeing those versions of the CIE illuminant D series but we never implemented them. That could be an interesting thing to add for sure. We are currently linearly interpolating them. Any thoughts @tjdcs?
I can take this issue at some point in the near future. It's relevant to my other work. @KelSolaar Can we please purchase the relevant standards? Or if we would prefer, I can access them via my other legal means. I just wouldn't be able to share them with the colour-maintenence team.
Description
CIE 204:2013 "Methods for Re-defining CIE D Illuminants" (https://cie.co.at/publications/methods-re-defining-cie-d-illuminants) defines a number of "highly smoothed" versions of the D and ID illuminants. They are referenced in https://www.oscars.org/sites/oscars/files/ssi_overview_2020-09-16.pdf.
PS.
colour
also doesn't seem to have a thing for "D illuminant of arbitrary CCT"? There are basis functions, but I don't see anything mixing them together.PPS. The documentation on top of https://github.com/colour-science/colour/blob/develop/colour/colorimetry/datasets/illuminants/sds.py is not getting rendered on the website, as the API doc switched to a more RST-driven approach.
(No, I don't need it for anything. I'm just being a squirrel and collecting stuff.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: