Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I do think is valuable, one to keep all the centrally located and two to not do any that has cost. Like hosting a server even if it's self hosted. I think what is needed are roles like moderators, etc... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I've thought of something similar before, I wanted to see if GitHub offers something like this directly. (Marketplace) The biggest drawback is that it's hosted externally, which means twice the work and twice the moderation. Or we create such a thing on the Website @BramSuurdje ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It seems to me that a proper
feedbackfeature voting site would help manage and prioritize community requests. Utilizing the Discussions on Github gets unwieldly, and it is more likely to result in lots of duplicate requests with no clear idea of how popular an idea is. Additionally, a centralized, dedicated feedback site has the benefit of acting as a repository of self-hosted projects for discovery.To be clear, this would not be a replacement for utilizing Discussions or the Issue tracker, and that would be made explicit on the site.
I'm thinking that we could utilize Fider or ClearFlask or Astuto, all of which are open source.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions