"valarray<complex>"

[jwakely]

[numeric.requirements]:

[Example 1 : It is valid to instantiate valarray<complex>, but operator>() will not be successfully instantiated for
valarray<complex> operands, since complex does not have any ordering operators. — end example]

What is valarray<complex>? What is complex?

Referring to operator>() with parentheses is wrong too, there's no such function signature, and that's not a valid function call expression.

[tkoeppe]

Maybe this is pre-standard (or even pre-template?) wording... we should probably say valarray<complex<T>>.

Or maybe CTAD is now actually making the example correct again :-)

[CaseyCarter]

Or maybe CTAD is now actually making the example correct again :-)

Clearly the best fix here is for Core to change the language to make the note correct.