You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By default, we don't leverage threading server/processing side since it's a highly constrained resource.
But in local mode, and when partitioning sink data into multiple files, parallelizing the close operation makes sense as the purges may include more than one partition.
Providing hooks to wrap the cache of open partitions purge and close operations would benefit applications that were designed specifically for partitioning data if the container hosting the application can provide cpus for the threads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By default, we don't leverage threading server/processing side since it's a highly constrained resource.
But in local mode, and when partitioning sink data into multiple files, parallelizing the close operation makes sense as the purges may include more than one partition.
Providing hooks to wrap the cache of open partitions purge and close operations would benefit applications that were designed specifically for partitioning data if the container hosting the application can provide cpus for the threads.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: