Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question]: is the reasoning from #5440 not working for openrouter models? #5593

Closed
1 task done
kajdo opened this issue Feb 2, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done
Labels
❓ question Further information is requested

Comments

@kajdo
Copy link

kajdo commented Feb 2, 2025

What is your question?

Hi,

I tried openrouter - deepseek/deepseek-r1:free which does show the thinking process in openrouter chat but i don't see the indicator as implemented in #5440

Image

More Details

i saw in the comments that the cache and browser local storage should be cleared - so i did this as well (after i did a git pull and a docker pull)

not sure if i have to configure something, or if this pull request is not intended to work for openrouter models ... or something strange happens

What is the main subject of your question?

No response

Screenshots

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@kajdo kajdo added the ❓ question Further information is requested label Feb 2, 2025
@fuegovic
Copy link
Collaborator

fuegovic commented Feb 2, 2025

It does work, but I did notice that the free version is somewhat less reliable.

Image

@kajdo
Copy link
Author

kajdo commented Feb 2, 2025

thx for the info @fuegovic, but I think something is wrong on my setup - i just tried with the deepseek/deepseek-r1 (non-free), deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1.5b and deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b and the "thinking" does not appear as well

as said in my initial question,
i did git pull, docker pull and then restarted the docker container ... browser cache and data was cleaned before test as well

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 2, 2025
@danny-avila danny-avila converted this issue into discussion #5597 Feb 2, 2025

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
❓ question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants