Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Why some parameters are differents than Itead's ZBDongle-E firmware #108

Open
yoch opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@yoch
Copy link

yoch commented Jul 15, 2024

Hi,

First of all thank you very much for your repository !

I compared the configuration parameters between Itead and your last NCP firmware (7.4.3.0) for ZBDongle-E, and found some differences :

Parameter Itead Darkxst
CONFIG_PACKET_BUFFER_COUNT 250 255
CONFIG_ADDRESS_TABLE_SIZE 32 16
CONFIG_MULTICAST_TABLE_SIZE 8 16

Can you please tell me if these differences are significant, and what is their purpose?

@darkxst
Copy link
Owner

darkxst commented Jul 16, 2024

packet buffer = 255 is a special value that allows it to use avalailable memory for packet buffer.

I not sure why Address table is smaller, but generally parameters are set per what ZHA and/or Z2M expect.

you can find more info about the various settings here if your curious

https://github.com/SiliconLabs/gecko_sdk/blob/gsdk_4.4/protocol/flex/stack/config/ember-configuration-defaults.h

@yoch
Copy link
Author

yoch commented Jul 16, 2024

Thank you !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants