You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As we spoke about during the GSoC Sync meeting on 30th June, we plan to eventually include the same example from cupertino_http and cronet_http but which uses JavaClient. Should I create a new GitHub issue for including an example in package:java_http?
I agree, it's a good idea to replace the example in java_http_example.dart with the same example used in cronet_http/cupertino_http.
java_http_example.dart currently uses code from java_http_base.dart, so we can remove java_http_base.dart after we've replaced the example code in java_http_example.dart with the sample example from cronet_http/cupertino_http.
After PR #980 is merged we no longer need java_http_test.dart, therefore the file will be removed in a future PR (context).
I'm wondering if we still need the other files generated by the Dart
create
command or can we remove them as well:As we spoke about during the GSoC Sync meeting on 30th June, we plan to eventually include the same example from cupertino_http and cronet_http but which uses
JavaClient
. Should I create a new GitHub issue for including an example inpackage:java_http
?java_http ☕ team:
@brianquinlan
@HosseinYousefi
Tracking issue: #957
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: