We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ActivityDefinitions currently contain the following information attributes: "url": "http://medizininformatik-initiative.de/bpe/Process/feasibilityRequest", "version": "1.0", "name": "FeasibilityRequest", "title": "Feasibility Request", "subtitle": "Feasibility Request Process", "status": "active", "experimental": false, "date": "2022-06-07", "publisher": "MII",
as this example shows the direct relationship with the plugin a process belongs to has to be inferred or guessed and is not made explicit.
This means that when querying the ActivityDefinitions of a site it is difficult to get an overview of the installed plugins.
The information about which plugin a process belongs to should be part of the activity definition - ideally with the version of the plugin.
Two conceivable ways to solve this are either:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
ActivityDefinitions currently contain the following information attributes:
"url": "http://medizininformatik-initiative.de/bpe/Process/feasibilityRequest",
"version": "1.0",
"name": "FeasibilityRequest",
"title": "Feasibility Request",
"subtitle": "Feasibility Request Process",
"status": "active",
"experimental": false,
"date": "2022-06-07",
"publisher": "MII",
as this example shows the direct relationship with the plugin a process belongs to has to be inferred or guessed and is not made explicit.
This means that when querying the ActivityDefinitions of a site it is difficult to get an overview of the installed plugins.
Related Problem
Describe the Solution You’d Like
The information about which plugin a process belongs to should be part of the activity definition - ideally with the version of the plugin.
Two conceivable ways to solve this are either:
Describe Alternatives You’ve Considered
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: