1) Find the pertinent Tcl script that runs the test: a .exp script in the same directory, or one of the ancestors' directories. The significant part is the filename.
For example, for test case
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pragma-diag-1.c
, it's
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp
, where the filename is dg.exp
.
2) Figure out the appropriate "make" target, normally based on the
source language for the test. For the above example, it's check-gcc
.
Other targets are e.g.: check-c++
, check-fortran
, check-ada
or check-go
. For a full list see Makefile.def
in the repository
root directory and grep for check-c++
.
Those language targets also run tests for compiler support libraries for
the given language. For example check-ada
adds and runs tests for
libada
, use check-gcc-ada
to run only the compiler tests but
no library tests.
3) Run make in your BUILDDIR/gcc
(not in BUILDDIR
or you will also
check the libraries), passing in a suitable value for RUNTESTFLAGS
based
on the filename found in step 1 above.
For this case, giving it a couple of -v
flags for verbosity (so that
we can see the command-line of the compiler invocation) it would be:
$ make -jN && make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="-v -v dg.exp=pragma-diag-1.c"
for some N; I like the make && make check-FOO
construction to ensure
that the compiler is rebuilt before running the tests.
You can also use wildcards e.g.:
make -j64 && make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="-v -v dg.exp=pragma-diag-*.c"
(and can use -jN
for some N on the make check-FOO
invocation if
there are a lot of tests; I tend not to use it for a small number of tests,
to avoid interleaving of output in the logs).
Testcases that apply to both C and C++ should live in c-c++-common
.
You can run them by making both the check-gcc
and check-g++
Makefile targets. Adapting the idea from above, here's an invocation I
used whilst working on a patch:
make -k -j64 \ && make check-gcc check-g++ \ RUNTESTFLAGS="-v -v dg.exp=Wformat-pr88257.c"
Here's a yet more complicated example, which runs various tests from both
dg.exp
and tree-ssa.exp
(with multiple wildcards), and runs them
for both 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs:
make check-gcc \ RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} dg.exp='pr10474.c pr15698*.c' tree-ssa.exp=20030530-2.c"
By default DejaGnu merely emits the names of unexpected results: typically FAILs results for test failures (and XPASS for unexpected successes), along with a summary at the end.
If you want to see all of the results, look for the .sum
file (e.g.
in testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
.
For example, whilst working on a bug fix, I invoked the tests via:
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="-v -v --target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} dg.exp=*sarif*.c"
and got a testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
containing:
Test run by david on Fri Mar 24 10:10:20 2023 Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu === gcc tests === Schedule of variations: unix/-m32 unix/-m64 Running target unix/-m32 Running /home/david/coding/gcc-sarif-support/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/diagnostic-input-charset-sarif-1.c (test for excess errors) PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-1.c -Wc++-compat scan-sarif-file "version": "2.1.0" [...snip...] PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-FIXME.c -Wc++-compat scan-sarif-file "text": "invalid UTF-8 character <80>" PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-FIXME.c -Wc++-compat scan-sarif-file "text": "invalid UTF-8 character <99>" PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-Winvalid-utf8.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) XFAIL: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-bad-encoding.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) XFAIL: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-malformed-utf8.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary for unix/-m32 === # of expected passes 71 # of unexpected failures 1 # of expected failures 4 Running target unix/-m64 Running /home/david/coding/gcc-sarif-support/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/diagnostic-input-charset-sarif-1.c (test for excess errors) PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-1.c -Wc++-compat scan-sarif-file "version": "2.1.0" [...snip...] PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-FIXME.c -Wc++-compat scan-sarif-file "text": "invalid UTF-8 character <99>" PASS: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-Winvalid-utf8.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) XFAIL: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-bad-encoding.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) XFAIL: c-c++-common/diagnostic-format-sarif-file-malformed-utf8.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) === gcc Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes 71 # of unexpected failures 1 # of expected failures 4 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 142 # of unexpected failures 2 # of expected failures 8 /home/david/coding/gcc-sarif-support/build/gcc/xgcc version 13.0.1 20230321 (experimental) (GCC)
I never get the wildcard invocation correct on the first time, so this is useful for double-checking that the tests I hoped to run are actually running and passing.
If you want even more detail, see the .log
file (such as
testsuite/gcc/gcc.log
). You can use this to find the command lines
used to invoke gcc, which may be helpful when debugging why a test case
is failing.
If a DejaGnu test is failing with "test for excess errors"
you can go into gcc/testsuite/lib/prune.exp and uncomment this line
within proc prune_gcc_output
:
#send_user "After:$text\n"
to:
send_user "After:$text\n"
This will print any messages that weren't pruned by dg-
directives.