-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The predicted results are very different between using python and imagej ? #1
Comments
Here is my model summary, and the input should be |
Hi, I have tried the models exported by |
Thank you @WeisongZhao! Do you mean that your input is float between 0 and 1? We did not test with TensorFlow (TF) 12.0.0. Did you train your model with that version? Or did you train it in TF 13.0.0? |
Yes, the 13.1.0 (fail), and 12.0.0 (success) are used, and my input and output is 0~1 float. |
We are working in the development of the plugin. Would yo mind to give us some feed back about the plugin and try the current version? |
I have tried with It works well for now, and there seems have the 'normalization' problem. In my use age, the small patches (128x128) is working well, and larger patches(256x256) will cause some saturation situation. I will have a try on the developer plugin. Some small questions: |
Good, thanks! If you have a trained network and an example image, we can put it on the web page and advertise it as well. Just write us to [email protected] |
Hi, I have trained a network with keras, and exported it to a
.h5
file. I used the code in thisrepo.
to generate the.pb
model, and try to predict images using imagej with your plug-in. It appears that the python results and imagej predicted results are very different. Can you tell me what the potential mistake is ? Many thanks !The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: