Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add XML namespace: HFS #23

Open
dd388 opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Add XML namespace: HFS #23

dd388 opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@dd388
Copy link

dd388 commented Aug 25, 2015

The following attributes appear to be unique to HFS filesystems that would benefit from a separate namespace as they currently do not have a logical home within the existing DFXML elements.

  1. File is "invisible" (yes/no flag)
  2. File is "locked" (yes/no flag)
  3. Size of resource fork (integer)
  4. File type and creator code (two sets of four alphanumeric characters separated by a forward slash)

More information on the file type and creator codes:

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

Those are handy references. I'm surprised the Wikipedia page doesn't need disambiguation links.

Would a namespace of http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/HFS work? (That wiki page currently redirects to HFS+'s page, but a set of HFS reference data or xml can motivate an HFS page.)

@dd388
Copy link
Author

dd388 commented Aug 25, 2015

http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/HFS would work.

HFS and HFS+ volumes do share certain properties (e.g., resource forks) and it might be worth using the same namespace to refer to either of these filesystems, since that is the convention used by TSK. (See: http://wiki.sleuthkit.org/index.php?title=HFS)

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

I stumbled on another facet of HFS when testing the Disktype translator. An HFS file system can wrap an HFS+ file system. (Example.)

@dd388
Copy link
Author

dd388 commented Jun 20, 2017

I found the disktype writeup of this phenomenon here: http://disktype.sourceforge.net/doc/ch03s02.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants