You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Various categories in imgCIF have names starting with diffrn (e.g. diffrn_scan_axis, diffrn_scan). I believe it is implied that a child data name of _diffrn.id is present in the category in these cases, but such child data names are not always defined by the dictionary. Am I correct in suggesting that these data names should be added to the relevant categories and to the category keys as well? I believe it is correct to say that for most data files these child data names can be left out as they implicitly take the value of _diffrn.id for data blocks containing data from a single wavelength, so there are no implications for existing data files of these data names being added in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Various categories in imgCIF have names starting with
diffrn
(e.g.diffrn_scan_axis
,diffrn_scan
). I believe it is implied that a child data name of_diffrn.id
is present in the category in these cases, but such child data names are not always defined by the dictionary. Am I correct in suggesting that these data names should be added to the relevant categories and to the category keys as well? I believe it is correct to say that for most data files these child data names can be left out as they implicitly take the value of_diffrn.id
for data blocks containing data from a single wavelength, so there are no implications for existing data files of these data names being added in.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: