Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Planner] Re-evaluate selection rules at start for orders with deferred execution #229

Closed
tangobravo62 opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Planner] Re-evaluate selection rules at start for orders with deferred execution #229

tangobravo62 opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@emelchinger
Labels
bug Something isn't working implemented Issue has been implemented and is ready for test

Comments

@tangobravo62
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently processing orders are only evaluated once for the available input files, which is at the time of releasing.

The attribute executionTime was introduced expressly to postpone an order until a sufficient number of input products is available. But the current handling makes this attribute completely useless.

Therefore orders, for which the execution is deferred, shall be re-evaluated regarding their available input products once the execution time is reached.
@tangobravo62 tangobravo62 added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 21, 2024
emelchinger added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2025
@emelchinger
Planner #229: re-evaluate product queries of orders with execution ti…
d974c81 
…me directly before start.
@emelchinger emelchinger added the implemented Issue has been implemented and is ready for test label Jan 8, 2025
@emelchinger
Copy link
Collaborator

Implemented and locally successfull tested.

@emelchinger emelchinger mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2025
Closed
@tangobravo62
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Works as expected with pre-generated processing orders in INPULS Systematic Production. Issue closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@emelchinger emelchinger

Labels
bug Something isn't working implemented Issue has been implemented and is ready for test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tangobravo62 @emelchinger