You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ok, i only have a rough understanding of our buffer management, but on certain machine configurations AURA fails for buffer management related reasons.
how much of the main memory is reserved for buffers is currently defined relatively to the available memory.
may be it'd be wise to mix relative memory usage with specific limits such as a lower limit of buffers to reserve memory for (MIN_BUFFER_COUNT). does that make sense?
that shouldn't happen in any case, right? at least the system should tell the user on startup that there isn't enough memory for AURA / the query (yet, not with a fixed 1 GB requirement i'd say).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ok, i only have a rough understanding of our buffer management, but on certain machine configurations AURA fails for buffer management related reasons.
how much of the main memory is reserved for buffers is currently defined relatively to the available memory.
when the
BUFFER_LOAD_FACTOR
is chosen very small (e.g. 1%), there might not be (m)any buffers on small machines, see https://travis-ci.org/lauritzthamsen/AURA/builds/29074045may be it'd be wise to mix relative memory usage with specific limits such as a lower limit of buffers to reserve memory for (
MIN_BUFFER_COUNT
). does that make sense?when the
BUFFER_LOAD_FACTOR
is however set to be a bigger chuck (e.g. 40%), the system currently can run out of memory, see https://travis-ci.org/lauritzthamsen/AURA/builds/29075554that shouldn't happen in any case, right? at least the system should tell the user on startup that there isn't enough memory for AURA / the query (yet, not with a fixed 1 GB requirement i'd say).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: