Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the order of arguments #40208

Closed
tdykstra opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #40619
Closed

Fix the order of arguments #40208

tdykstra opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #40619
Assignees
Labels
doc-bug Problem with the content; needs to be fixed [org][type][category] dotnet-fundamentals/svc okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. Pri2 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. resolved-by-customer Indicates issues where the customer no longer needs any help. [org][resolution] user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback".

Comments

@tdykstra
Copy link
Contributor

tdykstra commented Mar 25, 2024

Type of issue

Typo

Description

Verbatim from the feedback control:

The order of arguments does not match what the dotnet format -h command tells us which is dotnet format [slnPath] [command] [options]

Page URL

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/tools/dotnet-format

Content source URL

https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/core/tools/dotnet-format.md

Document Version Independent Id

51e52bf4-61b8-6f7d-d947-8bcd71c7bd7d

Article author

@tdykstra

Metadata

  • ID: 009c8a6b-f784-7111-8662-43b2da30b0ab
  • Service: dotnet-fundamentals

Associated WorkItem - 239902

@tdykstra tdykstra added doc-bug Problem with the content; needs to be fixed [org][type][category] user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback". labels Mar 25, 2024
@tdykstra tdykstra self-assigned this Mar 25, 2024
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Mar 25, 2024
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot removed the ⌚ Not Triaged Not triaged label Mar 25, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. label Mar 25, 2024
@tdykstra tdykstra added 🗺️ reQUEST Triggers an issue to be imported into Quest. and removed Pri2 labels Apr 2, 2024
@sequestor sequestor bot added 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. and removed 🗺️ reQUEST Triggers an issue to be imported into Quest. labels Apr 2, 2024
@timdeschryver
Copy link
Contributor

@tdykstra If you want I can work on this issue (and some additional ones about the CLI commands that you've created within the same timeframe).
I don't want to come over as "aggressive", so feel free to just say no or ignore this comment :)

@tdykstra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thaks for the offer, @timdeschryver, unfortunately I made a PR before I saw your offer. If you'd like to take other issues, just let me know which ones you want and I'll assign them to you.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs April 2024 sprint Apr 25, 2024
@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot added the resolved-by-customer Indicates issues where the customer no longer needs any help. [org][resolution] label Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc-bug Problem with the content; needs to be fixed [org][type][category] dotnet-fundamentals/svc okr-quality Content-quality KR: Concerns article defects (bugs), freshness, or build warnings. Pri2 📌 seQUESTered Identifies that an issue has been imported into Quest. resolved-by-customer Indicates issues where the customer no longer needs any help. [org][resolution] user-feedback Issues related to "Unified User Feedback".
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants