You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed that my Custom ExceptionFilterAttribute doesn't get hit when using this approach to WebApi. Maybe that's the reason you have a try catch in the DelegatingHandlers? Do you know why the normal filtering mechanism doesn't work with this approach? In general, I'm kind of anti try/catch and I think the built-in WebApi approach is generally pretty decent.
Of course, this one small place for catching isn't bad; I guess I'm curious if there's a technical reason.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be honest, I don't know, but I can imagine that exception filters only work on controllers. At a broader level, I think you'd stack delegating handlers (as decorators) to apply exception filtering. As a simplification, this project places the exception handling inside the single delegating handler, because:
that's the simplest thing that could possibly work
having try-catch statements makes it very clear how things are handled (compared to exception filters, which always freak me out a bit), and it gives you full control.
In case the generic handling becomes too much, it can be easily refactored into smaller methods, or even extracted into delegating handlers.
I've noticed that my Custom ExceptionFilterAttribute doesn't get hit when using this approach to WebApi. Maybe that's the reason you have a try catch in the DelegatingHandlers? Do you know why the normal filtering mechanism doesn't work with this approach? In general, I'm kind of anti try/catch and I think the built-in WebApi approach is generally pretty decent.
Of course, this one small place for catching isn't bad; I guess I'm curious if there's a technical reason.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: