You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to clear up some questions with how CDA_R30 and CDA_R31 are treated interchangeability in some places in the code. When saving the output format it appears the logic saves either status CDA_R30, CDA_R31 as CDA_R30. However there are multiple if conditions throughout the code which are looking specifically for a type of CDA_R31. Are these planned to continue to be use interchangeably? Will there ever be a CDA_R31 specific validator?
/addKARStatus endpoint saves either as CDA_R30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We want to clear up some questions with how CDA_R30 and CDA_R31 are treated interchangeability in some places in the code. When saving the output format it appears the logic saves either status CDA_R30, CDA_R31 as CDA_R30. However there are multiple if conditions throughout the code which are looking specifically for a type of CDA_R31. Are these planned to continue to be use interchangeably? Will there ever be a CDA_R31 specific validator?
/addKARStatus endpoint saves either as CDA_R30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: