MIT License

[DanBurkhardt]

Hey @dvkch !

I sent a PR yesterday implementing Swift Package Manager-- I also want to see if you would review another PR where I just add the standard MIT license.

I saw your note in the README and the good thing is that MIT license has the same effect, as it only requires attribution.

The issue with not having one is that a company or other non-individual might not be able to use this package because of the absence of a license for stupid legal risks. Idk about everywhere else but we are always kind of watching out legal risk in the US.

Lmk and I will issue another PR without changing what you wrote, just adding a license file with the standard MIT license text, and a reference to it below what you already have in the README.

• Dan

[dvkch]

Hey again @DanBurkhardt , after looking into it I think i am comfortable with the MIT license, and understand businesses requirements for it. If you have a minute feel free to submit another PR, if not i will do my best to get it done ASAP

[DanBurkhardt]

PR opened yesterday with just the license added.