Restructure Package Naming #1924
juliapampus
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Thanks for putting this together. Here are some things we need to consider:
Maybe we can start to distill the rules for package naming which will allow us to derive the individual module names? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Package Renaming
If you take a look at the current packaging structure, the naming is not consistent. Sometimes it is *.core and core.*, same goes for spi. The module refactoring did not make it better. As people are using the EDC artifacts as dependecy, we need to discuss about a cleaner package naming.
Initial proposal for the "new" column tbw.
:core
:data-protocols
:extensions
:samples
:spi
:system-tests
:tooling
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions