You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Operating companies should be able to choose between multiple wallet solutions when onboarding customers to the network. The issuance / onbarding flow in the portal should be enabled accordingly.
The solution is similar to the state of implementation with the Catena-X Jupiter release but the operating company has the option to choose between multiple wallet providers.
What's the benefit?
In the current implementation state the operating company is technically restricted to one wallet provider which is leading to a potential vendor lock-in situation.
Enabling the option to choose between multiple wallet solutions in the issuance flow would mitigate that risk.
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented.
In the context of the standards 126 and 127, typically only one is applicable, depending on the specific use case. Please cross out one of the two standards that does not apply.
This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed
Justification:(Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)
Overview
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
Operating companies should be able to choose between multiple wallet solutions when onboarding customers to the network. The issuance / onbarding flow in the portal should be enabled accordingly.
The solution is similar to the state of implementation with the Catena-X Jupiter release but the operating company has the option to choose between multiple wallet providers.
What's the benefit?
In the current implementation state the operating company is technically restricted to one wallet provider which is leading to a potential vendor lock-in situation.
Enabling the option to choose between multiple wallet solutions in the issuance flow would mitigate that risk.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Potentially required changes to the ssi-credential-issuer need to be clarified.
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
Proposed improvements
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Stories
Acceptance Criteria
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Expected Result
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented.
In the context of the standards 126 and 127, typically only one is applicable, depending on the specific use case. Please cross out one of the two standards that does not apply.
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
relates to
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: