Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature] add support for caching image layers #23

Open
sescobb27 opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

[feature] add support for caching image layers #23

sescobb27 opened this issue Jan 30, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@sescobb27 sescobb27 added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Jan 30, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 3, 2019

Some hints from the uber makisu project - uber-archive/makisu#72

@sescobb27
Copy link
Contributor Author

i think this is related to this issue:

when we are trying to build new images that were already built we are having this error message on intermediary containers

12:37:09.242 [error] error running task 1 for esl/foo-phx-cowboy-2.6#0.0.2 reason: "{\"message\":\"Conflict. The container name \\\"/builder\\\" is already in use by container \\\"9d9580f9ba7a1174009336699cf77d6c22da2e7b4df9b6f7bc27b6c63870953f\\\". You have to remove (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.\"}\n"

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 9, 2019

i think this is related to this issue:

when we are trying to build new images that were already built we are having this error message on intermediary containers

12:37:09.242 [error] error running task 1 for esl/foo-phx-cowboy-2.6#0.0.2 reason: "{\"message\":\"Conflict. The container name \\\"/builder\\\" is already in use by container \\\"9d9580f9ba7a1174009336699cf77d6c22da2e7b4df9b6f7bc27b6c63870953f\\\". You have to remove (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name.\"}\n"

So when building - we should use an autogenerated UUID name instead of builder? Cleaning up "builder" would not be in itself sufficient as there might be two builds running concurrently, both invoking the API of the single docker daemon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant