I was curious about the possibility of using Docker outside of its deployment/ops wheelhouse, so I came up with a contrived use for it in a front-end workflow. I arrived at this idea, in part, after trying to explain how/why Docker is useful to a few people who aren't traditionally interested in ops and being met with either glazed eyes or responses like, "Sounds cool, but why should I care?" A particular conversation with someone who'd had trouble installing and configuring Google's Closure Compiler came to mind, so that's the use-case I ran with.
- Install Docker. (Note: I was working on a Linux host, so if you're using OS X or Windows, you may need to use Docker Machine, Boot2Docker, etc.)
- run
docker build -t closure-compiler-demo .from the project root order to build a Docker image from the local Dockerfile. This will create an image which contains the specified version of Java (via OpenJDK) and Closure Compiler. It also specifies the default command to run when this image is used to build and execute a container. - You can build and execute a one-time-use Docker container using your newly
created image by running:
docker run --rm -v $(pwd)/src/app.js:/app.js -v $(pwd)/build:/build closure-compiler-demo(I've also bundled this up as therake buildtask in the provided Rakefile in order to show how it might be used as part of a workflow.)
If you've run the commands listed above, the result should see be a "compiled"
version of the JavaScript file found in src/app.js in build/app.min.js. The
approach used here involves mounting files from the project in the
container,
but you could probably also pass their contents to the container using *nix
utilities and a different CMD. It's also worth noting that this approach
assumes that the build target (build/app.min.js) already exists, as
controlling ownership of files created by Docker is ... complicated.
Hopefully the value-add provided by Docker here is apparent: Two commands have allowed you to create a sandboxed environment, which can be versioned and shared with teammates/contributors, containing all of the dependencies/configuration/etc. it needs in order to complete the task at hand. There is also zero chance of causing conflicts on your host system because you've added/removed/upgraded/downgraded packages in order to satisfy the current project's dependency requirements. (Caveat: Docker versions and image/container tag names could potentially cause conflicts, so you may want to come up with a naming convention for the latter.)