Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new datasets: STORY HUNGA TONGA ERUPTION #176

Open
5 tasks done
AparicioSF opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 10 comments
Open
5 tasks done

Add new datasets: STORY HUNGA TONGA ERUPTION #176

AparicioSF opened this issue Jul 17, 2024 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@AparicioSF
Copy link
Contributor

AparicioSF commented Jul 17, 2024

  • - JAXA ALOS-2 - for January 2022 in Hunga Tonga location - source (included as static image)

  • - Maps generated from the study - source @anca.anghelea how can we get their maps? (not to be included)

  • Science Hub Challenge (datasets in Xcube) no priority right now

@lubojr lubojr added this to RACE Jul 24, 2024
@lubojr lubojr moved this to Todo in RACE Jul 24, 2024
@santilland santilland changed the title Add new datasets: STORY HUNG TONGA ERUPTION Add new datasets: STORY HUNGA TONGA ERUPTION Aug 7, 2024
@santilland
Copy link
Collaborator

santilland commented Aug 7, 2024

XCube integration of data being worked on (i.e. Tejas coordination)
PLES team to be included in conversation, preparation of yaml files based on xcube template (tagging @FedericoRondoni )

@santilland santilland moved this from Todo to Inputs missing in RACE Aug 7, 2024
@santilland
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems there is an issue with data identifiers using "/" breaking the paths defined within STAC, fix will be needed on endpoint

@aapopescu
Copy link
Contributor

@FedericoRondoni
Copy link
Contributor

YAML file for the Hunga Tonga story ready and pulled via this pull request #186

@FedericoRondoni
Copy link
Contributor

@AparicioSF currently working on the description of indicator SHC4_propagated_uncertainty

@FedericoRondoni
Copy link
Contributor

@aapopescu are you ok with the descriptions we have on SHC3 and SHC4?

@FedericoRondoni
Copy link
Contributor

@lubojr on SHC4 we suggest to use the percentage instead of the decimal values. Let us know what you think

@lubojr
Copy link
Member

lubojr commented Sep 24, 2024

@FedericoRondoni You mean for the legend? Sure. I had no context for the actual meaning of the variable shown, so I've reused what was configured in the YAML.
Should I multiply it by 100 and update the label to % ?

-> Done

@AparicioSF
Copy link
Contributor Author

Finished the description of indicator SHC4_propagated_uncertainty @FedericoRondoni FYI

@aapopescu
Copy link
Contributor

@santilland can we close?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Inputs missing
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants