Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2020. It is now read-only.

TREO administration #18

Open
HenrikOssipoff opened this issue Feb 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

TREO administration #18

HenrikOssipoff opened this issue Feb 26, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@HenrikOssipoff
Copy link
Contributor

It has been proposed to not allow TREO members access to the actual Django admin, but rather make a nice interface for them to do TREO tasks; add incoming payments (positive transactions), add sales manually (negative transactions), add new products, administer products etc.

@HenrikOssipoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

My initial thinking here is to create a simple interface using Bootstrap. The authentication can safely stay with the User models, and we'll simply create a Group called TREO and throw these people into. We wont give these users superuser and admin rights.

We can then keep the admin site for ourselves, for doing behind-the-scenes CRUD operations.

@fishbacon
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe we should request a specification for such a thing from the actual TREO? I imagine they have some suggestions, like the interface they are using now is a spreadsheet and Django-admin, so if we could make it like a spreadsheet I think they would like it better.

@HenrikOssipoff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Talking to other people? Are you crazy?!

Who's up for getting some user stories then? :)


Sendt fra Mailbox

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Mark Faldborg [email protected]
wrote:

Maybe we should request a specification for such a thing from the actual TREO? I imagine they have some suggestions, like the interface they are using now is a spreadsheet and Django-admin, so if we could make it like a spreadsheet I think they would like it better.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)

@jones-g
Copy link

jones-g commented Feb 27, 2015

O..M..G... Use cases?! What is going on are we going to get Rich Pictures aswell:)

All kidding aside having them mock up an interface on paper or something might be a good idea.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants