You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 10, 2020. It is now read-only.
It has been proposed to not allow TREO members access to the actual Django admin, but rather make a nice interface for them to do TREO tasks; add incoming payments (positive transactions), add sales manually (negative transactions), add new products, administer products etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My initial thinking here is to create a simple interface using Bootstrap. The authentication can safely stay with the User models, and we'll simply create a Group called TREO and throw these people into. We wont give these users superuser and admin rights.
We can then keep the admin site for ourselves, for doing behind-the-scenes CRUD operations.
Maybe we should request a specification for such a thing from the actual TREO? I imagine they have some suggestions, like the interface they are using now is a spreadsheet and Django-admin, so if we could make it like a spreadsheet I think they would like it better.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Mark Faldborg [email protected]
wrote:
Maybe we should request a specification for such a thing from the actual TREO? I imagine they have some suggestions, like the interface they are using now is a spreadsheet and Django-admin, so if we could make it like a spreadsheet I think they would like it better.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #18 (comment)
It has been proposed to not allow TREO members access to the actual Django admin, but rather make a nice interface for them to do TREO tasks; add incoming payments (positive transactions), add sales manually (negative transactions), add new products, administer products etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: