Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving sectors? #683

Open
rctGuy101 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Moving sectors? #683

rctGuy101 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@rctGuy101
Copy link

Just an idea.
(Like wind, ice, conveyer belts)

@fabiangreffrath
Copy link
Owner

fabiangreffrath commented Oct 21, 2020

That'd be a Boom feature.

@rctGuy101
Copy link
Author

Anything against that? I just thought of that. I think it would be nice

@fabiangreffrath
Copy link
Owner

I am not opposed to this per se. It may be a good opportunity for Boom feature sneak-in. However, two things to keep in mind: First, Boom's code base has already diverged quite a lot from Vanilla's and thus Chocolate's, so porting over of features is a lot more complicated than just copy-and-paste. Second, this will open a can of worms and raise people's expectations that more Boom features are about to come in soon.

The larger and more significant part of Boom features, namely generalized linedef types and sectors, are quite a different league, though. I remember that @mfrancis95 worked on adding support for extended linedef types in the past, but I have no idea how far this has come. However, it would probably have been a better starting point for Boom feature sneak-in.

@mfrancis95
Copy link

Unfortunately I haven't had time to work on it like I used to. :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants