Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible new feature #167

Open
termitaklk opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Possible new feature #167

termitaklk opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@termitaklk
Copy link

Hello good afternoon, a question. Would it be possible to implement something similar to edopro that uses the whitelist property to create formats in the game?

With the whitelist you can define the list of banned, limited, semi-limited and allowed cards. That is, if you specify a total of 5 thousand cards in the banlist, only these will appear in the deck editor when selecting this format. This would be very useful to be able to add alternative formats such as goat, edison, hat and tengu.

@fallenstardust
Copy link
Owner

users can import lflist.conf of their own rule. just open lflist.conf files through YGOMobile

@VaHReX
Copy link
Contributor

VaHReX commented Oct 24, 2024

Yes, but the whitelist works the opposite way to the banlist, while the banlist allows you to limit cards by adding them to the iflist.conf file, the whitelist excludes cards that are not in that file, so if for example I add 40 cards, only these cards will be displayed in the game. This method is used in alternative formats, such as EDISON, where there is a limited number of cards since the banlist dates back to 2010, the whitelist in this case would contain the cards that were released up to that date, and it is convenient for duelists who want to play that format since they would not see the cards that came out after 2010.

This is an example of the EDISON format whitelist:

2010.03 Edison.lflist.zip

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants