[DataCap Refresh] <1st> Review of <Tianji Studio Fil+>

[liyunzhi-666]

Basic info

1. Type of allocator: [manual]

2. Paste your JSON number: [1042]

3. Allocator verification: [yes]

4. Allocator Application
5. Compliance Report

Current allocation distribution

Client name	DC granted
Encyclopedia of DNA Elements	1.5 PiB
LAMOST DR8 public data	900 TiB
Aiyao	2.5 PiB

I. Encyclopedia of DNA Elements

• DC requested: 10 PiB
• DC granted so far: 1.5 PiB

II. Dataset Completion

https://registry.opendata.aws/encode-project/
https://www.encodeproject.org

III. Does the list of SPs provided and updated in the issue match the list of SPs used for deals?

Basic match. If there are additions or changes to the SPs, the client is updated in github.

IV. How many replicas has the client declared vs how many been made so far:

10 vs 7

V. Please provide a list of SPs used for deals and their retrieval rates

SP ID	% retrieval	Meet the >75% retrieval?
f03178144	80.79%	YES
f03179572	62.62%	NO
f03214937	46.79%	NO
f03178077	82.50%	YES
f03179570	37.88%	NO
f0870558	67.58%	NO
f03055018	93.67%	YES
f01315096	92.11%	YES
f03055005	57.46%	NO
f03055029	95.41%	YES
f01106668	95.00%	YES
f03151456	65.19%	NO
f03151449	68.98%	NO

I. LAMOST DR8 public data(The client commitment to start deals soon)

• DC requested: 10 PiB
• DC granted so far: 900 TiB

I. Aiyao

• DC requested: 10 PiB
• DC granted so far: 2.5 PiB

II. Dataset Completion

liyunzhi-666/TianjiStudio-Fil#8 (comment)

III. Does the list of SPs provided and updated in the issue match the list of SPs used for deals?

Basic match. If there are additions or changes to the SPs, the client is updated in github.

IV. How many replicas has the client declared vs how many been made so far:

10 vs 5

V. Please provide a list of SPs used for deals and their retrieval rates

SP ID	% retrieval	Meet the >75% retrieval?
f03229933	29.22%	NO
f03229932	34.83%	NO
f03214937	47.40%	NO
f03179570	41.87%	NO
f03179572	60.78%	NO
f03231121	0.00%	NO
f03231117	0.00%	NO

There are a few SPs's Spark retrieval success rate of 0. Client has updated the description in the comments.

Allocation summary

7. Notes from the Allocator

When the Allocator finds that there is no significant improvement in the success rate of Spark retrieval for SPs working with Client,Allocator takes steps to limit the amount of Datacap approved.Allocator approves 1 PiB instead of approving 2 PiB.

8. Did the allocator report up to date any issues or discrepancies that occurred during the application processing?

Yes.The Allocator was malfunctioning during the last signing. An issue has been submitted and is waiting to be resolved by the official team.fidlabs/allocator-tooling#102

9. What steps have been taken to minimize unfair or risky practices in the allocation process?

1.Regular checking. Check the client's application through the CID checker and when the report is unsatisfactory, take appropriate action to limit the approval.
2.Request more data samples from clients.
3.Request client for KYC review. For example, ask client to send document information to allocator official email for further approval.

10. How did these distributions add value to the Filecoin ecosystem?

1.Allocator encourages different types of datasets, including public datasets and enterprise open datasets.
2.Allocator is concerned about whether datasets are duplicated on the Filecoin network. Of course, if the client gives a valid reason, we generally adopt a policy of encouragement and tolerance, because it is true that, as the client said, many datasets may have been stored before but are now outdated, or in the case of cooperating SPs, it is the first time for them to store them.

11. Please confirm that you have maintained the standards set forward in your application for each disbursement issued to clients and that you understand the Fil+ guidelines set forward in your application

Yes

12. Please confirm that you understand that by submitting this Github request, you will receive a diligence review that will require you to return to this issue to provide updates.

Yes

[filecoin-watchdog]

@liyunzhi-666
Encyclopedia of DNA Elements

• The requested DataCap exceeds the maximum limit of 5 PiB as specified in the allocator rules. The dataset has been stored at least three times within the Filecoin Plus (Fil+) program. The allocator raised a question on this matter, which was not addressed, and the topic was not revisited.
  references:

• [DataCap Application] Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) <2/2> filecoin-plus-large-datasets#1867
• [DataCap Application] Encyclopedia of DNA Elements filecoin-plus-large-datasets#2113
• [DataCap Application] CryptoCraft-Public Genomic Data Repositories and Resources filecoin-plus-large-datasets#2149

• While most storage providers (SPs) operate under VPNs, which is permitted under the allocator rules, no additional due diligence was performed to address this aspect.
• The geographical diversification requirement of three continents and four cities, as stipulated by the allocator, was not met and is difficult to verify due to VPN usage.
• Additionally, there is no information provided about the data preparation steps, which could offer the community insights into how the files can be processed and computed in the future.

LAMOST DR8 public data

• The requested DataCap significantly exceeds the allowable limit, by more than three times the amount specified in the allocator rules.
• There is no evidence of any geographical verification of SPs, some of whom partially operate under VPNs, making compliance with geographical diversification requirements impossible to confirm.
• Most of the questions raised during the application process remained unanswered. Despite this, the allocator proceeded with assigning DataCap.
• Furthermore, no details were provided regarding the data preparation steps, which could help the community understand how the files can be processed and computed.

Aiyao

• No indication exists that any Know Your Customer (KYC) or Know Your Business (KYB) processes were conducted for the client or storage providers (who also use VPNs).
• Many questions raised during the application process were left unanswered.
• Additionally, no information was provided regarding data preparation, the societal or community value of the data, or its potential use.
• Of the seven SPs involved, five demonstrated 0% retrievability.

---

In the Allocator Application, the allocator said:

In order to track VPN usage, we will implement a monitoring system to detect and log VPN activity, including connection time, duration, and source IP address.

What's the progress in preparing such a tool? Will this be open source or available somehow to use broadly?

[filecoin-watchdog]

@liyunzhi-666 I'm awaiting your response.

[Kevin-FF-USA]

Hi @liyunzhi-666

Thanks for submitting this application for refresh.
Wanted to send you a friendly update - once you finish answering questions on the diligence raised by Watchdog, this will move forward with Galen on behalf of the Governance this week. If you have any questions or need support until then, please let us know.

Warmly,
-Kevin