You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As identified in the discussion on #1479, the Context Part of the FDC3 standard defines the JSON encoding of Context objects, which is (in JS and .NET so far) translated into a set of types defined for that language, which may change the type of specific fields to an idiomatic type for that language (for example Date fields in JSON are string encoded according to ISO 8601-1:2019, while in JavaScript/TypeScript the Date type is used, which stringifies to the same format).
The Context overview should:
include content explaining the difference between the JSON definitions and definitions for a specific languages API binding.
include language-specific details on field type conventions (if they differ by language binding - e.g. dates and times).
link to source code and packages for language-specific bindings for context types.
Enhancement Request
As identified in the discussion on #1479, the Context Part of the FDC3 standard defines the JSON encoding of Context objects, which is (in JS and .NET so far) translated into a set of types defined for that language, which may change the type of specific fields to an idiomatic type for that language (for example Date fields in JSON are string encoded according to ISO 8601-1:2019, while in JavaScript/TypeScript the
Date
type is used, which stringifies to the same format).The Context overview should:
@hellosmithy @bingenito @kemerava
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: