Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename to com.libretro.RetroArch? #292

Open
RobLoach opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Rename to com.libretro.RetroArch? #292

RobLoach opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@RobLoach
Copy link
Collaborator

I know we generally don't rename Flathub applications, but can we? 🥺

@geekley
Copy link

geekley commented Jun 22, 2024

(not saying I'm necessarily in favor of this, but...)
If we're going that route wouldn't com.retroarch.RetroArch be better?
Easier to not have to remember it's libretro when auto-completing flatpak commands on the shell.

@RobLoach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I guess that makes sense. While libretro.com is the parent organization, the application's main website is retroarch.com.

@albertescanes
Copy link

Hi,

Renaming app ID is possible with the EOL rebase
https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/maintenance/#renaming-the-flatpak-id

On the other hand, com.libretro.RetroArch is in fact the upstream app ID, so I guess that should be used, even if retroarch.com exists.

@matheuswillder
Copy link

Renaming app ID is possible with the EOL rebase https://docs.flathub.org/docs/for-app-authors/maintenance/#renaming-the-flatpak-id

Considering that the RetroArch release cycle has been quite slow lately, if this is going to be done I think it would be a good idea to do it before the next release, since the release may have notes about the change in the release notes on the blog, this will make it easier for users and will be visible on the blog for a long time (since release cycle are slow now).

As a regular user, I would say that renaming is a good idea. When I first installed the RetroArch Flatpak I saw org.libretro and ended up opening the domain libretro.org thinking it was registered 😅

@RobLoach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

RobLoach commented Dec 6, 2024

I think you're right about now being potentially a good time to take it on. I just want to make sure the Flathub mods are onboard too, particularly because I am unable to get at the settings page to rename the repo.

My main concern about not taking it on is security, as matheuswillder alluded to. Would love it if we did.

If we're going that route wouldn't com.retroarch.RetroArch be better?

Thinking further on the name I believe com.libretro.RetroArch may be best in case we decide to publish some of the cores as individual Flatpaks under the libretro org name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants