-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename to com.libretro.RetroArch
?
#292
Comments
(not saying I'm necessarily in favor of this, but...) |
I guess that makes sense. While |
Hi, Renaming app ID is possible with the EOL rebase On the other hand, |
Considering that the RetroArch release cycle has been quite slow lately, if this is going to be done I think it would be a good idea to do it before the next release, since the release may have notes about the change in the release notes on the blog, this will make it easier for users and will be visible on the blog for a long time (since release cycle are slow now). As a regular user, I would say that renaming is a good idea. When I first installed the RetroArch Flatpak I saw org.libretro and ended up opening the domain libretro.org thinking it was registered 😅 |
I think you're right about now being potentially a good time to take it on. I just want to make sure the Flathub mods are onboard too, particularly because I am unable to get at the settings page to rename the repo. My main concern about not taking it on is security, as matheuswillder alluded to. Would love it if we did.
Thinking further on the name I believe com.libretro.RetroArch may be best in case we decide to publish some of the cores as individual Flatpaks under the libretro org name. |
I know we generally don't rename Flathub applications, but can we? 🥺
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: