Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a lot of bilingual dictionaries using omegawiki #30

Open
andyjh92 opened this issue Jul 11, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

add a lot of bilingual dictionaries using omegawiki #30

andyjh92 opened this issue Jul 11, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@andyjh92
Copy link

Hi,

[1] shows how to create bilingual dictionaries using omegawiki as a source. [2] uses these dictionaries for example. Could you add these dictionaries?

Regards, Andy

[1] http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Getting_bilingual_dictionaries_from_OmegaWiki
[2] http://dictionarymid.sourceforge.net/ http://dictionarymid.sourceforge.net/dictionaries/dictsBinlingualsOmegaWiki.html

@humenda
Copy link
Member

humenda commented Jul 11, 2017 via email

@humenda
Copy link
Member

humenda commented Jul 11, 2017 via email

@humenda humenda closed this as completed Jul 18, 2017
@humenda
Copy link
Member

humenda commented Jul 18, 2017

I'm closing this issue, because I think we shouldn't consider OMEGA wiki. AFAIK, they wanted to merge with Wiktionary and we have importer scripts from WikDict.com for this.

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Jul 18, 2017

(Nearly?) each wiktionary project is a separate entity, so it's not obvious that omegawiki is going to merge into all wiktionaries, and I wouldn't hasten so much to close this ticket.

The concept-to-form organisation of omegawiki could indeed yield some pretty exotic language pairs, potentially.

@humenda
Copy link
Member

humenda commented Jul 18, 2017

I would say that Wiktionary has already outperformed OMEGA wiki for quite a few language pairs. Given how active people are, I would say the same will be true for less popular language pairs. Feel free to reopen the issue, but I have no ambitions whatsoever to work on this.

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Jul 18, 2017

You would say, or you know? :-) A few wiktionaries are very good, others got closed for dormancy (that surely improves the overall statistics).

These tickets are not necessarily for you personally to take up, especially if you're planning on broadening the scale of the project. So thanks for your OK to re-open, it's better to have the resource visible.

@bansp bansp reopened this Jul 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants