-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Formalize 'mailto:' format in 'href' field #148
Comments
mailto: already supports multiple emails, delimited by comma. |
By using a mailto: link, you're implying https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6068 |
Right you are, I did not check the RFC on this, only the Wikipedia page. So I would amend my original suggestions, making |
@fschiettecatte Sounds like a plan. @jxchong in your use case, would you want to group emails by type of contact? I fully expect we wouldn't want to show patient emails in our system, but we may consider providing the clinicians emails if provided. Looking at the specification, I think
I think that means we can't really do what's being proposed in 1.x without causing confusion. I think we HAVE to wait for 2.x, and turn Thoughts? |
Update for supporting multiple email addresses in the `email` field, see issue #148 .
@Relequestual we could group emails by type of contact in the future but it's not so critical right now since patient-initiated requests aren't allowed over MME for policy reasons anyway. I think it's more important to just have some sort of supporting for providing multiple email address that belong to clinicians so that if there's one lead clinician + geneticist + lab scientist, they can all be included in any correspondence. |
One way to handle this would be to turn the The scheme we are proposing for 1.2 is because we have only one contact. |
I like François's idea of making "contact" into a list/array, though not
crazy about implicitly defining the first on the list as the primary.
Preferably we would have a "primary" boolean field in the contact-entry
object that can be set to "true" when such?
Yeah, redefining href as a bona-fide https/http and email to a single email
makes perfect sense when we switch to above design of contacts.
Best,
Harindra
…On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:40 PM, François Schiettecatte < ***@***.***> wrote:
One way to handle this would be to turn the contact into an array and
designate the first one in the array as primary contact. I would also be
tempted to redefine the href as a bona-fide http|https url and the email
to a single email address.
The scheme we are proposing for 1.2 is because we have only one contact.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#148 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOf2_I_JfZKTqtYCJn5u4JUnQ2lfQM_Xks5smW9egaJpZM4PkYZt>
.
|
Essentially, this is what I was thinking too.
This sounds OK, but I expect we would always want to show all clinicians (or email all clinicians) associated with the patient. For DECIPHER, we only allow for one user to be a clinician for a patient. |
We need to formalize the 'mailto:' format in the 'href' field. 'mailto:' as specified only supports one email address, however some sites are currently overloading this to include multiple, coma-delimited, email addresses, for example:
We should formalize this in a 1.2 release so that the spec reflects the reality in the field.
(See Issue #128 for background information)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: