Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed evaulation & compare to Fortran/cpp solutions #4

Open
5 tasks
wabu opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 1 comment
Open
5 tasks

Speed evaulation & compare to Fortran/cpp solutions #4

wabu opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
community input Would like to gain more insights from the community.

Comments

@wabu
Copy link
Contributor

wabu commented Jun 21, 2019

As we general gain on flexibility, debugability and explainability compared to fortran/c++ solutions, it would be good to know how much speed offer for this.

For this, we should first look at good fortran/cpp solution of e.g. a Random Walk and what exactly they do implement, fix different size and other constrains for the simulation (different hardware, too) before we measure both solutions.

Furthermore, configuring a GPU-executer for speed-comparison would be nice to have.

  • find a nice (simple, still not rivial, good quality) fortran/cpp simulation
  • define different hardware and test sizes for comparism
  • implement and test our solution
  • compare spped
  • configure gpu-executor and compare speed
@wabu wabu assigned wabu and unassigned wabu Jun 21, 2019
@wabu wabu added the community input Would like to gain more insights from the community. label Jun 21, 2019
@wabu wabu pinned this issue Jun 24, 2019
@wabu wabu unpinned this issue Jun 28, 2019
@wabu
Copy link
Contributor Author

wabu commented Sep 30, 2019

perhaps use problem 280 of Project Euler?
https://projecteuler.net/problem=280

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community input Would like to gain more insights from the community.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant