You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is not an issue with DiscoDock per se... my issue is with selecting the best tool for screening.
While DiffDock-L seems to be the best model, it is much slower than the DiffDock-S variants or FlexDock, which is problematic for screening large libraries. Which variants of Diffdock would be the best for screening a large library? Is Disco-Diffdock better than Diffdock-S+CB? From the average running time reported in the table with DiffDock-S+CB vs the table with Disco-Diffdock, it looks like DiffDock-S+CB would be much faster, is it the case?
Hi,
It is not an issue with DiscoDock per se... my issue is with selecting the best tool for screening.
While DiffDock-L seems to be the best model, it is much slower than the DiffDock-S variants or FlexDock, which is problematic for screening large libraries. Which variants of Diffdock would be the best for screening a large library? Is Disco-Diffdock better than Diffdock-S+CB? From the average running time reported in the table with DiffDock-S+CB vs the table with Disco-Diffdock, it looks like DiffDock-S+CB would be much faster, is it the case?
Are you going to release FlexDock (https://openreview.net/pdf?id=TYta9svB0R)?
Best,
Christian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: