Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed and accuracy: Disco-Diffdock vs DiffDockS+CB vs FlexDock #2

Open
CLG68 opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Speed and accuracy: Disco-Diffdock vs DiffDockS+CB vs FlexDock #2

CLG68 opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@CLG68
Copy link

CLG68 commented Oct 4, 2024

Hi,

It is not an issue with DiscoDock per se... my issue is with selecting the best tool for screening.

While DiffDock-L seems to be the best model, it is much slower than the DiffDock-S variants or FlexDock, which is problematic for screening large libraries. Which variants of Diffdock would be the best for screening a large library? Is Disco-Diffdock better than Diffdock-S+CB? From the average running time reported in the table with DiffDock-S+CB vs the table with Disco-Diffdock, it looks like DiffDock-S+CB would be much faster, is it the case?

Are you going to release FlexDock (https://openreview.net/pdf?id=TYta9svB0R)?

Best,
Christian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant