Repository visibility docs for GHES are misleading with references to GitHub.com

[sparrowt]

Code of Conduct

• I have read and agree to the GitHub Docs project's Code of Conduct

What article on docs.github.com is affected?

https://docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/managing-repository-settings/setting-repository-visibility

What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?

Both of these sections Changing from private to public and Changing from internal to public say:

The code will be visible to everyone who can visit GitHub.com.

which is not true or relevant for GitHub Enterprise Server which is self-hosted and not linked to github.com

Additional information

No response

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this issue. A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

[sparrowt]

Ah I've found in the source it uses {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom_the_website %} but on GHES docs that still produces the string "GitHub.com" so that needs changing or replacing I guess based on some {% ifversion ghes or ghec %} or {% ifversion ghes %}?

[nguyenalex836]

@sparrowt Thank you for raising this issue (and for the context regarding that source)! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening an issue! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

[nguyenalex836]

@sparrowt Howdy! 👋 Our SMEs confirmed we should replace {% data variables.product.prodname_dotcom_the_website %} with {% data variables.location.product_location %} 💛

Let us know if you'd like to open a PR to make this update!

[nguyenalex836]

@janbrasna I'll go ahead and merge the PR you linked above 💛