Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

♻️ Refactor: Migrate randString to rand v2 #3329

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

ksw2000
Copy link
Member

@ksw2000 ksw2000 commented Feb 25, 2025

Description

This PR migrates randString from math/rand to math/rand/v2 to improve randomness quality and concurrency safety. In addition, it reduces execution time by approximately 97%, as shown in the benchmark test below.

func Benchmark_RandomString(b *testing.B) {
	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
		_ = randString(100)
	}
}
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/gofiber/fiber/v3/client
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
                │   old.txt    │               new.txt               │
                │    sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base                │
_RandomString-4   9862.0n ± 0%   252.1n ± 3%  -97.44% (p=0.000 n=10)

Changes introduced

List the new features or adjustments introduced in this pull request. Provide details on benchmarks, documentation updates, changelog entries, and if applicable, the migration guide.

  • Benchmarks: Describe any performance benchmarks and improvements related to the changes.
  • Documentation Update: Detail the updates made to the documentation and links to the changed files.
  • Changelog/What's New: Include a summary of the additions for the upcoming release notes.
  • Migration Guide: If necessary, provide a guide or steps for users to migrate their existing code to accommodate these changes.
  • API Alignment with Express: Explain how the changes align with the Express API.
  • API Longevity: Discuss the steps taken to ensure that the new or updated APIs are consistent and not prone to breaking changes.
  • Examples: Provide examples demonstrating the new features or changes in action.

Type of change

  • Performance improvement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

  • Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
  • Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
  • Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
  • Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
  • Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes modify the random string generation logic in the client/hooks.go file. The code now imports math/rand/v2, changes the header declaration from a variable to a constant, and adjusts the letter index calculation. The function previously named randString has been renamed to unsafeRandString and updated to use rand.Uint64() for random value generation. Correspondingly, tests in client/hooks_test.go now call unsafeRandString instead of the old function.

Changes

File Change Summary
client/hooks.go - Updated import from math/rand to math/rand/v2
- Changed headerAccept from a variable to a constant
- Modified letterIdxMax calculation from 63 to 64
- Renamed randString to unsafeRandString and updated its implementation to use rand.Uint64()
- Updated boundary generation
client/hooks_test.go Replaced call from randString to unsafeRandString in the Test_Rand_String function

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant P as ParserRequestHeader
    participant U as unsafeRandString
    participant R as math/rand/v2

    P ->> U: Request random string (length 16)
    U ->> R: Generate random value via rand.Uint64()
    R -->> U: Return random value
    U -->> P: Return generated random string
Loading

Poem

I’m the rabbit hopping through code so fine,
Tweaking constants and functions line by line.
From var to const, a switch so neat,
And random numbers now rhythmically beat.
With math/rand/v2 lighting the way,
My code hops light, come what may! 🐇🥕


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f93555 and 4930b6c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • client/hooks.go (3 hunks)
  • client/hooks_test.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
client/hooks_test.go (1)

41-41: Function name updated to match implementation change.

The test now correctly calls the renamed unsafeRandString function instead of the old randString function, maintaining test coverage after the refactoring.

client/hooks.go (8)

6-6: Upgraded to math/rand/v2 package.

This change is aligned with the PR objective to migrate to the newer version of the rand package, which provides better randomness quality and concurrency safety.


20-21: Changed headerAccept from var to const.

Good practice to declare string constants as const rather than var since they're immutable.


31-31: Adjusted letterIdxMax calculation from 63 to 64 bits.

This adjustment matches the v2 package, which uses a full 64-bit random number generation via Uint64(). The previous calculation was based on 63 bits due to limitations in the v1 package.


34-40: Refactored randString to unsafeRandString with v2 implementation.

This implementation change:

  1. Renames the function to indicate it uses unsafe string conversion
  2. Uses rand.Uint64() directly instead of creating a new source with timestamp
  3. Improves concurrency safety by avoiding global state
  4. Achieves significant performance improvement as mentioned in the PR objectives

The benchmark results (97.44% performance improvement) support this change.


42-44: Updated random number generation for new cache.

The code correctly refreshes the random number cache when exhausted, now using rand.Uint64() from v2 package.


46-51: Improved bit manipulation for letter selection.

The implementation efficiently extracts random indices from the generated random number, utilizing the full 64 bits available in v2.


136-137: Updated randString call to unsafeRandString.

The function call has been updated to use the new implementation for boundary generation, maintaining consistent usage throughout the codebase.


1-321:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify the migration completeness with benchmark tests.

The code changes look solid and align with the PR objectives. The migration to rand/v2 should provide better randomness quality and concurrency safety. The benchmark results claimed in the PR (97.44% performance improvement) are significant.

Consider documenting this significant performance improvement in any relevant API documentation to inform users of the benefits.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining uses of old randString function or math/rand package
grep -r "randString" --include="*.go" . | grep -v "unsafeRandString"
grep -r "math/rand\"" --include="*.go" . | grep -v "math/rand/v2"

Length of output: 131


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
echo "Searching for old math/rand references (excluding math/rand/v2)..."
rg '"math/rand"' --include="*.go" | grep -v "rand/v2"
echo "Searching for any usage of randString that is not unsafeRandString..."
rg "randString" --include="*.go" | grep -v "unsafeRandString"

Length of output: 1289


Migration Verified – Benchmark Documentation Recommended

  • Verified that there are no legacy references to the old math/rand or the previous randString implementation in the codebase.
  • The significant benchmark improvement (97.44%) seems promising. Please ensure that these benchmarks are manually verified and that the performance gains are documented in the API docs.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.25%. Comparing base (3f93555) to head (4930b6c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3329   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.25%   84.25%           
=======================================
  Files         116      116           
  Lines       11555    11556    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         9736     9737    +1     
  Misses       1391     1391           
  Partials      428      428           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.25% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ksw2000 ksw2000 marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 14:10
@ksw2000 ksw2000 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2025 14:10
@ksw2000 ksw2000 requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team February 25, 2025 14:10
@gaby
Copy link
Member

gaby commented Feb 25, 2025

More information here: https://go.dev/blog/randv2

Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 added this to the v3 milestone Feb 25, 2025
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 435fa42 into gofiber:main Feb 25, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants