Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add architecture/service map with ports #1795

Open
snakebyte91 opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add architecture/service map with ports #1795

snakebyte91 opened this issue Jul 12, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@snakebyte91
Copy link

After upgrading from helm chart v1.14.0 to v1.15.0 we noticed in our test environment that the trivy pod sends requests to the core pod now.

v1.14.0
Trivy -> registry

v1.15.0
Trivy -> core

Is there any service/architecture map with ports? That would help us to write/optimize the network policies and we could also contribute the network policies to the helm chart.

@zyyw
Copy link
Collaborator

zyyw commented Jul 25, 2024

@snakebyte91 could you please provide us with details showing that trivy pod sends requests to registry in Harbor helm v1.14.0 while trivy pod sends requests to core in Harbor helm v1.15.0?

We do introduced SBOM generation in harbor helm v1.15.0, in addition to vulnerability scan in v1.14.0, but these two features follow the same request-response process as defined in this pluggable-scanner-spec. There should be no changes regarding the request-response between harbor component and trivy pod.

@snakebyte91
Copy link
Author

Sorry for the delay I was on parental leave. I compared the network policies from our dev and prod environment and I saw that in our prod environment the trivy pod was already able to send requests to the core pod. That rule was missing in our dev environment. So there is no change between 1.14 and 1.15.

It would be great to have a service map with ports so it would be much easier to write the right network policies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants