Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow building of mpv and mplayer packages without being installed #147

Open
survient opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Allow building of mpv and mplayer packages without being installed #147

survient opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@survient
Copy link

survient commented Jul 12, 2022

I'd like to package xsecurelock for Fedora with the mpv and mplayer packages included however the current build process for xsecurelock require that paths to the mpv and mplayer binaries be provided for each respective packages. Fedora does not include mplayer or mpv in its repositories due to licensing issues and I'm not able to satisfy these build dependencies at present in trying to include these packages.

If the binaries are not a hard requirement to build the corresponding xsecurelock packages then I'd request that the configure process be modified to allow an override or some change in logic that doesn't require the binaries to be present to include the packages. Users installing the software would be able to get base functionality out of the main rpm package and additional functionality if they install the needed mpv and mplayer dependencies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant