From 66e204130609bedcfdb7f94595ee7e529ea5c746 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: grantmcdermott
In the classic 2x2 DiD case (two units, two periods), a simple +interaction effect between two dummy variables suffices to recover the +treatment effect. In base R this might look something like:
lm(y ~ Dtreated_unit * Dpost_treatment, data = somedata)
where the resulting coefficient on the @@ -278,7 +283,7 @@
emfx()
, which is a thin(ish) wrapper around marginaleffects::slopes()
.
+doing so: emfx()
, which is a thin(ish) wrapper around marginaleffects::slopes()
.
For example, we can recover the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) as follows.
@@ -366,23 +371,23 @@Presentation= "Event study", notes = "Std. errors are clustered at the county level" )
hypothesis
+powerful hypothesis
infrastructure of the underlying marginaleffects
package. Probably the easiest way to do this is by using
b[i]
-style positional arguments, where “[i]
”
@@ -987,23 +993,23 @@ McDermott G (2024). etwfe: Extended Two-Way Fixed Effects. -R package version 0.3.5.9002, https://grantmcdermott.com/etwfe/. +R package version 0.4.0, https://grantmcdermott.com/etwfe/.
@Manual{, title = {etwfe: Extended Two-Way Fixed Effects}, author = {Grant McDermott}, year = {2024}, - note = {R package version 0.3.5.9002}, + note = {R package version 0.4.0}, url = {https://grantmcdermott.com/etwfe/}, }
CRAN release: 2024-02-27
cgroup = "never
) due to incorrect subsetting prior to recovering the marginal effects. Thanks to @paulofelipe for reporting (#37).