Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

renaming of assertion fields #509

Open
ahwagner opened this issue May 10, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

renaming of assertion fields #509

ahwagner opened this issue May 10, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@ahwagner
Copy link
Member

We had a discussion during the documentation sprint today about the use of the terms summary (e.g. variant summary, gene summary) and statement (e.g. evidence statement) in CIViC. Assertions currently have a summary with an associated description, but we discussed that labeling the summary field as a statement is more aligned with the principle of assertions and the intent of the field.

We also discussed how the description field is typically the aggregated details of how the summary (statement) was generated, and thus may benefit from a field label of details.

@kkrysiak @obigriffith @malachig @ebarnell and @arpaddanos, your input here would be helpful as we strive to align the terms we use across these concepts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant