[DataCap Application] <BlockLike>

[rileymoody]

Data Owner Name

Mody

Data Owner Country/Region

China

Data Owner Industry

Information, Media & Telecommunications

Website

https://airdrop.blocklike.com/

Social Media Handle

blocklikecom

Social Media Type

Twitter

What is your role related to the dataset

Dataset Owner

Total amount of DataCap being requested

2PiB

Expected size of single dataset (one copy)

250TiB

Number of replicas to store

8

Weekly allocation of DataCap requested

800TiB

On-chain address for first allocation

f1ns5wc5rbn3dmhc3wq3chsxyx556tfrze5la3zqa

Data Type of Application

Slingshot

Custom multisig

• Use Custom Multisig

Identifier

No response

Share a brief history of your project and organization

Blocklike is a media company focused on Web3 and the blockchain industry. It provides content and insights on cryptocurrency, decentralized technology, and blockchain trends. Through their platform, they share industry news, conduct interviews, and host events to drive conversation and growth within the Web3 ecosystem. Blocklike plays a key role in fostering community engagement and supporting discussions and developments in decentralized technologies. It also partners with blockchain innovators, offering comprehensive industry insights and promotional services.

Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?

Yes

If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders

No response

Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin

The data we are planning to store mainly consists of media materials, including images, videos, documents, and other related content. Additionally, there are materials related to event organization.

Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from

My Own Storage Infra

If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)

None

If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?

1.Data Organization and Classification: We will categorize all media materials, such as images, videos, and documents. Each type of data will be divided into appropriate batches to facilitate subsequent uploading and management.
2.Data Format and Compression: To ensure efficient data transmission and storage, we will perform appropriate format conversion and compression on the media data. Video files will be compressed using common formats such as MP4, images will use formats like JPEG or PNG, and documents will remain in standard formats such as PDF or DOCX.
3.Data Encryption and Verification: To ensure data security, we will encrypt the data before uploading using standard encryption techniques like AES. At the same time, we will generate a hash value of the data to verify the integrity and consistency of the data after it is uploaded.
4.Upload Tools: In terms of upload tools, we plan to use commonly used tools in the Filecoin ecosystem, such as Estuary or Lotus, to ensure the data is uploaded to the Filecoin network. We will choose appropriate tools for batch uploads based on the scale and type of data.
5.Node Selection: To ensure high availability and retrieval efficiency, we will collaborate with storage providers (SPs) that meet the Filecoin Plus requirements. This will ensure that data is stored on multiple geographically distributed nodes with sufficient backup mechanisms.

If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)

No response

Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.

This dataset has not been stored on the Filecoin network before. This time, we intend to store the dataset on the Filecoin network for the following reasons:

1.Data Backup and Security: The Filecoin network provides a decentralized storage solution, ensuring that data is stored across multiple geographic locations, which enhances data security and redundancy. Through this distributed storage model, we want to ensure that our media assets are preserved long-term and protected from the risk of data loss due to single points of failure.
2.Retrieval Efficiency and Accessibility: The Filecoin Plus program and its SP nodes offer efficient data retrieval services, which is crucial for a media company like ours. We aim to ensure that users around the world can access these media assets quickly and securely.

Please share a sample of the data

https://x.com/blocklikecom
https://blocklikecom.medium.com/

You can see that the content on these platforms is the data we need to store.

Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network

• I confirm

If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason

No response

What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data

Yearly

For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin

2 to 3 years

In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals

Greater China, Asia other than Greater China, North America

How will you be distributing your data to storage providers

Cloud storage (i.e. S3), HTTP or FTP server, IPFS, Shipping hard drives, Lotus built-in data transfer

How did you find your storage providers

Slack, Filmine, Big Data Exchange, Partners

If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used

No response

Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.

f02826588 guangdong
f02827996 guangdong
f02826007 singapore
f01082888 hk
f03081958 changsha

How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers

No response

If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here

No response

Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline

Yes

[datacap-bot]

Application is waiting for allocator review

[hash889900]

Please send proof of geolocation information for the following two SPs with your domain email to [email protected] to confirm your identity.
f02826007 singapore
f01082888 hk

[rileymoody]

Hello, @hash889900
I have sent the email. Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.

[hash889900]

f02826588 guangdong /ip4/202.105.141.162/tcp/1106
f02827996 guangdong /ip4/202.105.141.163/tcp/1313
f02826007 singapore /ip4/43.156.68.83/tcp/1403
f01082888 hk /ip4/46.19.166.55/tcp/4949
f03081958 changsha /ip4/113.219.198.14/tcp/4949

Location confirmed

[hash889900]

Please send proof of geolocation information for the following two SPs with your domain email to [email protected] to confirm your identity. f02826007 singapore f01082888 hk

confirmed

[hash889900]

Checked out the link to your samples and was wondering what specific types of data you are trying to store, can you elaborate?

[rileymoody]

@hash889900
The data we plan to store primarily includes media assets, such as images, videos, documents, and other relevant content. Additionally, there are materials associated with event organization. The data types will predominantly consist of video files, text documents, and compressed files. There will also be some CAR files, which are pre-processed files specific to our needs. These assets are essential for promoting activities, supporting event planning, and managing archives, helping with media publishing and project management.

[hash889900]

To reconfirm, is all this data publicly available?

[rileymoody]

@hash889900
Yes, we will also reach out to SP nodes that support retrieval to establish partnerships.

[datacap-bot]

Datacap Request Trigger

Total DataCap requested

2PiB

Expected weekly DataCap usage rate

800TiB

DataCap Amount - First Tranche

100TiB

Client address

f1ns5wc5rbn3dmhc3wq3chsxyx556tfrze5la3zqa

[datacap-bot]

DataCap Allocation requested

Multisig Notary address

Client address

f1ns5wc5rbn3dmhc3wq3chsxyx556tfrze5la3zqa

DataCap allocation requested

100TiB

Id

286c71c4-872e-4478-8f9d-89016e333ca4

[datacap-bot]

Application is ready to sign

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f01082888: 21.03%, f03081958: 27.09%, f02826007: 29.58%

⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

Some of the sp's have low retrieval rates, can you explain that?

[rileymoody]

@hash889900
f01082888: You can see that it is an exceptionally large node, so storing our data on it has only a minimal impact on its retrieval rate; however, this retrieval rate will gradually increase over time.

f02826007: The retrieval rate is currently lower due to recent instability in the network bandwidth of this node. We expect to see improvements the next time you check.

Additionally, we will be partnering with new nodes. Please continue to support our project, and you will see updated reports in the future.

[datacap-bot]

Application is in Refill

[datacap-bot]

Request Approved

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary

Message sent to Filecoin Network

bafy2bzacedy6bn4nt6zo2yjdvjug2ftvku74w3ogzsfn7l6butmishewb5gqk

Address

f1ns5wc5rbn3dmhc3wq3chsxyx556tfrze5la3zqa

Datacap Allocated

800TiB

Signer Address

f14oq4jctudvidvyhfmrp7qt6ndng7pr7ampp3miq

Id

1e8f1c5a-beef-442d-838d-56f7b545c252

You can check the status here https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedy6bn4nt6zo2yjdvjug2ftvku74w3ogzsfn7l6butmishewb5gqk

[datacap-bot]

Application is Granted

[hash889900]

Follow-up data distribution will be monitored on an ongoing basis

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 3 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f02827996: 23.09%, f03081958: 31.41%, f01082888: 20.53%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

✔️ Data replication looks healthy.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[datacap-bot]

Client used 75% of the allocated DataCap. Consider allocating next tranche.

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 27.41%

⚠️ 28.57% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 71.43% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 36.50% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.88%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 71.43% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.75% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

Please note the rational distribution of data

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

The report continues to be unhealthy, can you explain?Will affect the next round of datacap triggers

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩

[hash889900]

checker:manualTrigger

[datacap-bot]

DataCap and CID Checker Report Summary¹

Storage Provider Distribution

⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed more than 25% of total datacap - f03081958: 25.87%

⚠️ 14.29% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.

⚠️ 85.71% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.

Deal Data Replication

⚠️ 29.74% of deals are for data replicated across less than 4 storage providers.

Deal Data Shared with other Clients²

✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.

Full report

Click here to view the CID Checker report.

Footnotes

1. To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger ↩

2. To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ... ↩