Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA:LOGS:1.4.1.1 Update Needs New Test Case HIGH PRIORITY FOR CONTAINER 0.17.1 #662

Open
TessForGithub2 opened this issue Aug 5, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@TessForGithub2
Copy link
Contributor

DoT E2E testing is blocked until this is proven to be fixed:

MDepth,ROP,TQ on btm m,m/h,kft.lbf 10003,2.3,2.08 MDepth,ecd m,g/cm3 10005,1.11 MDepth,ecd m,g/cm3 10007,1.23
@TessForGithub2 TessForGithub2 added bug Something isn't working Blocked labels Aug 5, 2019
@TessForGithub2 TessForGithub2 added this to the Sprint 17 milestone Aug 5, 2019
@TessForGithub2 TessForGithub2 added Testing High Priority High Priority and removed bug Something isn't working labels Aug 5, 2019
@niaalex niaalex modified the milestones: Sprint 17, Sprint 18 Aug 5, 2019
@shehzadsidi
Copy link
Contributor

will work with Theresa for what is needed on testing. ETA 8/7 COB

@TessForGithub2
Copy link
Contributor Author

TessForGithub2 commented Aug 15, 2019

UPDATE: Shehzad reported only 2 rows of data are missing from the test result using GET. My thinking is that there is something faulty with the GET translation for the response. Whoever investigates this needs to verify that GET is handling the data correctly, since I see the correct results when I locally tested Update. I will open a new card for GET and keep this QA card open for further testing.

@shehzadsidi
Copy link
Contributor

the two rows of log Data still missing, tested 8/23

@shehzadsidi
Copy link
Contributor

MDepth,ROP,TQ on btm m,m/h,kft.lbf 10003,2.3,2.08 MDepth,ecd m,g/cm3 10005,1.11 MDepth,ecd m,g/cm3 10007,1.23 is still missing.

@niaalex
Copy link
Contributor

niaalex commented Aug 23, 2019

Is this a block on the client side?
If so, we will need to make sure they are aware of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants