You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of having file downloads be separate nodes, add them to the CRF publication directly as attributes. There should be general attributes by file type (e.g. msword, msexcel, pdf, etc.) and then these should be subsetted by language (e.g. msword-en, msword-es, etc.). There should be a catch-all files (and files-en, files-es, etc.). Attributes can be arrays, so that can be used to write a list of attributes if that is needed.
Add a CDE count so we know how many CDEs are present in each CRF. We could add a cde-count attribute, but it'd be quicker and hackier to add it to the end of the summary (e.g. Contains 12 CDEs.)
He also suggested proposing biolink:Measure (or questionnaire, instrument, CRF, etc.) as a list of biolink:CommonDataElements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@YaphetKG recommended two changes:
There should be general attributes by file type (e.g.. There should be a catch-allmsword
,msexcel
,pdf
, etc.) and then these should be subsetted by language (e.g.msword-en
,msword-es
, etc.)files
(andfiles-en
,files-es
, etc.). Attributes can be arrays, so that can be used to write a list of attributes if that is needed.cde-count
attribute, but it'd be quicker and hackier to add it to the end of the summary (e.g.Contains 12 CDEs.
)He also suggested proposing
biolink:Measure
(or questionnaire, instrument, CRF, etc.) as a list ofbiolink:CommonDataElement
s.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: