Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] Add a "Bypass Proxy Rule" feature #1559

Open
dmarkdmark opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[FR] Add a "Bypass Proxy Rule" feature #1559

dmarkdmark opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@dmarkdmark
Copy link

Feature description

This proxy software works great! I've abandoned both Black Cat and Shadowrocket, and now I only use this one. While using it, I noticed that the service mode only allows users to select the mode manually.

Clip_2024-12-18_15-05-26

Now, I’d like to have a feature where I can input a list of URLs to decide whether they should bypass the proxy or use it. This would work like a blacklist or whitelist to control whether the proxy software is used for accessing these URLs.

For example, if I input a URL like www.123456.com, I want to control whether it uses the proxy or not. If I choose to use the proxy, the software will route the request through the proxy to access the website. If I choose not to use the proxy, it will use my direct network connection to access the website instead.

It's not about rewriting the service mode, but adding some customization. Sometimes accessing a website directly (without the proxy) is faster, but in some cases, it's not clear why the proxy makes access very slow. So, I need this feature to control whether a specific website should go through the proxy or not.

@netrolite
Copy link

I absolutely second this! Came here to make a request about this exact feature and stumbled upon this issue

@S-Vladislav
Copy link

Agree, something like this will be very useful, also on mobile you already can choose which apps to proxy, which is a cool feature

@dmarkdmark
Copy link
Author

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants