You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of now, only plot_curve has an option for expressing uncertainty about parameter values (by setting the uc argument to a percentage value, resulting in ranges of uncertainty around a given parameter value). One could argue that uc — by being a numeric value — actually represents a form of risk. But irrespective of semantics, it would be desirable to include some means of expressing imprecision or vagueness in the other representations.
Perhaps a simple solution (or fall-back option) would be to specify parameter ranges (e.g., from min to max) and then create 2 graphs that represent the best and worst case scenarios?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of now, only
plot_curve
has an option for expressing uncertainty about parameter values (by setting theuc
argument to a percentage value, resulting in ranges of uncertainty around a given parameter value). One could argue thatuc
— by being a numeric value — actually represents a form of risk. But irrespective of semantics, it would be desirable to include some means of expressing imprecision or vagueness in the other representations.Perhaps a simple solution (or fall-back option) would be to specify parameter ranges (e.g., from
min
tomax
) and then create 2 graphs that represent the best and worst case scenarios?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: