Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

initial load of evaluationModels is executed twice #54

Open
jangalinski opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

initial load of evaluationModels is executed twice #54

jangalinski opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@jangalinski
Copy link
Contributor

Although #52 is fixed, I noticed something suspecious:

2020-10-08 18:07:33.445  INFO 33327 --- [aTaskExecutor-2] DmnDiagramEvaluationModelCacheJobHandler : saved evaluationModel: DmnDiagramEvaluationModel(diagramId=my-single-diagram, name=My Single Diagram, resourceName=diagram-my-single-diagram.dmn, deploymentId=ea3f842a-0965-11eb-b923-acde48001122, deploymentTime=Thu Oct 08 14:58:09 CEST 2020, decisionDefinitionId=single_1:1:ea48abef-0965-11eb-b923-acde48001122, inputs=[IntegerInputDefinition(key=customerAge, label=customerAge)], outputs=[StringOutputDefinition(key=reasons, label=reasons)], resultType=SINGLE)
2020-10-08 18:07:33.509  INFO 33327 --- [aTaskExecutor-3] DmnDiagramEvaluationModelCacheJobHandler : saved evaluationModel: DmnDiagramEvaluationModel(diagramId=my-single-diagram, name=My Single Diagram, resourceName=diagram-my-single-diagram.dmn, deploymentId=ea3f842a-0965-11eb-b923-acde48001122, deploymentTime=Thu Oct 08 14:58:09 CEST 2020, decisionDefinitionId=single_1:1:ea48abef-0965-11eb-b923-acde48001122, inputs=[IntegerInputDefinition(key=customerAge, label=customerAge)], outputs=[StringOutputDefinition(key=reasons, label=reasons)], resultType=SINGLE)

This is clearly an unnecessary duplicate execution and we should try to get rid of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant