We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者您好,在RIFE的inference_img.py中,是这样处理输入帧: https://github.com/hzwer/ECCV2022-RIFE/blob/638322e8bfe6daca4439f7b56503fef4b090d34f/inference_img.py#L57-L60
在Practical-RIFE中,输入帧被resize到(448, 256):
Practical-RIFE/inference_img.py
Lines 53 to 58 in 82906f0
请问这两种处理方式会对结果造成影响吗?为什么处理方式不一样?
另外还想请教一些问题:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
你好,后者可能是以前为了跑一些demo的遗留代码;1. 可以这样做 但是不建议把分辨率搞这么小再求光流,0.25x 可能就极限了 2. 不能 会很模糊
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
作者您好,在RIFE的inference_img.py中,是这样处理输入帧:
https://github.com/hzwer/ECCV2022-RIFE/blob/638322e8bfe6daca4439f7b56503fef4b090d34f/inference_img.py#L57-L60
在Practical-RIFE中,输入帧被resize到(448, 256):
Practical-RIFE/inference_img.py
Lines 53 to 58 in 82906f0
请问这两种处理方式会对结果造成影响吗?为什么处理方式不一样?
另外还想请教一些问题:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: